<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jump back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.daniels.net.nz/2007/07/06/jump-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.daniels.net.nz/2007/07/06/jump-back/</link>
	<description>Opinions, like they mattered</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.daniels.net.nz/2007/07/06/jump-back/comment-page-1/#comment-16131</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 02:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniels.net.nz/2007/07/06/jump-back/#comment-16131</guid>
		<description>I don't really like the interface to GDS, and Google is starting to scare me a little (search results to your computer appear on Google.com internet search results, etc). The benefit to GDS though is that I can get extensions for it to read more formats easily. I believe Windows Search (Vista) and Windows Desktop Search have the same functionality. I'm thinking of getting Windows Desktop Search, it's more integrated, and is essentially the same as Windows Instant Search in Vista. Speaking of which, I see version 4.0 is coming out soon and will search everything (including the web).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t really like the interface to GDS, and Google is starting to scare me a little (search results to your computer appear on Google.com internet search results, etc). The benefit to GDS though is that I can get extensions for it to read more formats easily. I believe Windows Search (Vista) and Windows Desktop Search have the same functionality. I&#8217;m thinking of getting Windows Desktop Search, it&#8217;s more integrated, and is essentially the same as Windows Instant Search in Vista. Speaking of which, I see version 4.0 is coming out soon and will search everything (including the web).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas</title>
		<link>http://www.daniels.net.nz/2007/07/06/jump-back/comment-page-1/#comment-16130</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 02:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniels.net.nz/2007/07/06/jump-back/#comment-16130</guid>
		<description>How does Google Desktop Search act on Windows? Might it perhaps be a suitable replacement?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does Google Desktop Search act on Windows? Might it perhaps be a suitable replacement?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
