Microsoft are close to bringing out their new version of Windows Mobile, which is now just Windows Phone 7. I went to the Tech Ed earlier this week and what I saw was probably more magical than the device.

Just how easy it is to make apps for.

Microsoft are really leveraging their history of excellent development tools here, with the combined use of Visual Studio 2010 for the code, and Expression Blend 4 for the user facing stuff (you can get away with a lot in Blend though) it really made making Windows Phone 7 apps that much more appealing.

I guess it’s also to do with the fact that being a .Net developer means the jump from making Web/Desktop apps isn’t a huge leap, in fact, if you’re a Silverlight developer (or even a WPF one) you can start making apps right now.

You can go to the Windows Phone 7 blog and download the UI guide and design templates now. A feature in Expression Blend is you can import PSD files and Blend will create all the layers and text blocks for you – it’s just a matter of databinding your controls and adding behaviours and you are away. Strange that they are not Expression Design templates, but I guess you can import them too.

The Windows Phone 7 development tools are due for release shortly with the Pivot and Panorama controls built in, and will be a free download (it will include Visual Studio 2010 Express for Windows Phone and Expression Blend 4 for Windows Phone; if you have the full versions, they’ll have plugins added).

If you were to look at what you use, most of all, during your time on a computer, what would it be? Other than those programs you need to work, it’s probably going to be your web browser.

But, if we look at our modern smart devices, with promises of bringing the internet to the palms of our hands, we are doing anything but.

Instead of going to touch.facebook.com on your iPhone, you instead open up the Facebook application. Despite having one of the best web browsers out there on mobile platforms, we seem to have stepped back in time to loading an application.

Google is probably still the one leading the charge in bringing everything to the web – most of their mobile apps are just HTML5 versions of their standard web apps apps, they’ve brought JavaScript performance to near-native speeds, and they’re going to release an operating system that is only a web browser.

However a couple of years ago, I would’ve thought this was the way everyone and thing is going – off into the cloud of happiness and awesome. We’re regressing, going from an interconnected network of pages, and back into the walled gardens we were trying to escape.

For example, instead of making their website better for use with your finger, New Zealand Herald decided to make an iPad app. Which is funny, because the iPad touts that it’s the best way to surf the web. And what does NZ Herald do that requires an app that their website can’t provide?

What is the problem here? Has the internet been late to the mobile party? HTML 5 and CSS 3 have been a long, very long, time coming. However with the iPhone and Android came some of the best implementations of these emerging standards. JavaScript now has frameworks to access location data, and support for multi-touch gestures. There are almost no excuses for a web site to not look at creating a fantastic mobile web application. A single mobile web application that is supported across many platforms, not just the flavour of the month (if you can consider the iPhone that).

Back in 2007 when the iPhone was first announced, Apple said that applications can only be built via the web standards. Shortly after, they announced the SDK and the rest is history.

Look at this…

Now look at this…

Look at this…

Now look at this…

Which ones were easier to read?

I’ve always had frustrations with websites that come with small text in the body of their pages. What’s worse about these sites? They seem to know it, and their solution isn’t to fix it but to provide options. The problem with options is your average user doesn’t care.

First sample is from Public Address. To change the text size, you have a small “Change text size” series of links to the right of the page. The second sample is from the recently revamped BBC News website, which follows in the footsteps of other BBC websites getting some glorious big text sizes. The third sample is from Daring Fireball, to change the font size, you scroll to the bottom of the page, click “Display Preferences” and then determine an appropriate size. Final sample is from IGN.com, massive text sizes.

Funnily enough, sites with big text sizes don’t have text size controls anywhere on their pages. They have been designed with good readability in mind. Resolutions are getting higher, meaning smaller text is becoming harder and harder to read. The web is trending towards large body text sizes, which is a big plus.

If your users are regular visitors, I guess they can spend their time working out how to change text size in either the browser, or on your web page. But if your visitors are new, what makes you think they are going to hang around for much longer if it’s difficult, or they have to jump through hoops, just to read it?

A couple of weeks ago I spotted an ad on TV3, it ended like this.

Last year I saw an ad on the PlayStation US Blog, it ended like this.

In fact, I could go through these ads frame-by-frame and you’d see that they’re the same. When I saw it I thought that either TV3 had partnered up with Sony to bring something (well, no), or TV3 are stupid and Sony was going to pwn them.

Turns out there is a third option, Sony will just go in for the ride. After the ad turned up on Joystiq, KB/PR person posted this on Twitter,

Dear TV3: You could have at least put my photo on top of the amp. Sheesh.

He’s referring to how there is a picture of SCEA CEO Jack Tretton on the top of his amp (in fact, I’m pretty sure in all the commercials there’s a photo of him somewhere, except for the ModNation Racers one where he was in the ad).

Well, thinking that Sony lawyers are quickly writing up a cease-and-desist notice, the KB/PR person did one more, posting to the PlayStation Blog,

[W]e’d like to help them out and make our ENTIRE LIBRARY OF COMMERCIALS available for them to copy in order to promote their programming. I only ask that TV3 doesn’t use our actual footage, but all future homages of this sort are now Kevin Butler sanctioned.

He even asks for a box set of the Flight of the Conchords, some thinking he was making reference to this scene in Episode 1 of Season 2.

I guess this was a win for all – TV3 got more publicity for the campaign than they were “expecting” (yeah, they probably engineered this whole thing), and Sony get more mileage out of an old ad and don’t come out looking like a giant corporation beating down smaller ones.

Or, Sony still have their lawyers at full force, they’re just distracting us all.

Recently I acquired tickets to go to Europe, that’s later this year, and I had a brief thought – I wonder if I could use WordPress for iPhone to make a travel blog. The intention was to be quick about it, i.e. take a photo, send it off, without thinking. Oh, and have it mark the location of where the photo was.

My search came to an end surprisingly quick, WordPress for iPhone already does geotagging, it’s just WordPress itself doesn’t take advantage of it yet. There is a way however, and I managed to get something going in no time.

When WordPress for iPhone geotags a post it adds several custom fields to the blog post, but we care about:

• geo_public – indicates that the geotagging data is public,
• geo_address – the address that was picked up,
• geo_latitude and geo_longitude – the important bits.

If it’s your blog, it’s up to you whether you heed geo_public, but this is a good indicator for whether you have a geotagged blog post or not.

Google Maps provides a handy API to provide static images, no key required. The URL is http://maps.google.com/maps/api/staticmap? and then you bundle in a bunch of parameters:

• sensor=false because we aren’t using a GPS to generate this map, at least, I think that’s the rule (cause we did)
• maptype can be satellite, terrain, hybrid or left out for the default street map. I like the terrain maps.
• size is the size you want the image to be, widthxheight.
• zoom is your preferred zoom size,
• markers in my example is size:small|lat,lon

And you have a nice Google Map! But in your WordPress blog template, find where you output your blog posts (my theme has this in a function) and do the following:

<?php if ( get_post_meta($post->ID, "geo_public", true) == "1" ) :
	$map = "http://maps.google.com/maps/api/staticmap?sensor=false&maptype=terrain&size=234x150&zoom=12&markers=size:small|";
	$lat = get_post_meta($post->ID, "geo_latitude", true);
	$lon = get_post_meta($post->ID, "geo_longitude", true);
	$map .= $lat . "," . $lon;
?>
<div class="post-map">
	<img src="<?php echo $map ?>" alt="Google Map" /><br />
	<?php echo get_post_meta($post->ID, "geo_address", true); ?>
</div>
<?php endif; ?>

Done!

Another thing of note, the WordPress app will resize photos down to 640×480 and I’ve found no way of changing it, so make sure your template is ready for it!

Plus, I haven’t decided if I would do it, mobile roaming charges are expensive, and I’d have better things to do than tell you all about it.

Work takes my programmers time, so anytime I think I can do something rather quickly, I’d try and make an effort. Since I’ve made Google Chrome my default browser, I thought I’d sink my teeth into some Chrome Extensions work – I attempted something similar with Mozilla Firefox, but found the whole development process to be clunky. Having a look over the API documentation, with Chrome you can build something up rather rapidly with no browser restarts. Sometimes, you don’t even need to reload the extension!

The problem

So, I went about thinking about what it is I do all the time that I could simplify. My immediate thought was posting links and pictures to Twitter. It’s something I regularly do, and so something I’d make easier. The process is rather complicated:

1. Copy the link.
2. Go to http://j.mp.
3. Paste the link, hit Shorten.
4. Click the Copy button.
5. Go to Twitter (it’s usually open on another tab).
6. Type in my message, paste the link.

Of course, if I used something like TweetDeck, the process is rather easier, copy the link, go to TweetDeck, paste the link. But, why not just do it in the browser?
(more…)

E3 2010 is over, and now we have a better idea of the motion control systems that the two big companies (Nintendo already has it) have been telling us about for over a year. Microsoft have finally unveiled the name for Project Natal – Kinect. Sony also unveiled some more games, a price point and a release date.

Microsoft had a huge marketing spending splurge, which kinda made me sick just looking at it all. As a gamer, I don’t care what some actor says about a peripheral (cheque please). But then, Microsoft isn’t aiming Kinect at me, they want that whole casual market to cash in on.

Controller free gaming isn’t new, Sony did it during the PS2 days with the EyeToy. It was fun, but you got over it quickly, and came about the same time the SingStar franchise was starting up – the party was always up for more SingStar than EyeToy. But, it never took off, and never got any compelling gaming experiences. As Richard Marks (the guy at Sony behind the EyeToy and Move) has said about it, sometimes you just want a button.

Now Microsoft is trying it on for size, and whilst they’ve got better technology, with infrared and 3D cameras and stuff, they’re still to convince me that it is a better system. There are signs that it is, but they’re going to have to capture me on more than the first round of shovelware. Which I think is the problem, Microsoft is focusing too much on the casual gamer, rather than its core audience. As IGN have pointed out,

Microsoft needs the core audience to tell the casual gamer what is cool. And if Microsoft doesn’t get that long-time Xbox 360 gamer behind Kinect, it will fail. We need some games that show what Kinect will do for someone who loves games like Halo or Castlevania or Gears of War. I’m not saying it has to be a first-person shooter where you are the gun, but we need to see more gamers that have depth to them.

Sony on the otherhand have a system built around the PlayStation Eye. They’ve been trialling ball-on-stick tracking for years now, since about 2000 (here is Richard Marks’ demo from about 2003/2004), but only now got a commercial product. PlayStation Move doesn’t just use the wand though, but it can do head and body tracking, facial recognition, all that fun stuff that’s ripe for exploitation.

There is definitely a broader range of games on Sony’s system, games that cater to the casual and the “core” gamer, and they’re also showing how it can be flexible by enabling support in other games as well, such as Heavy Rain and Little Big Planet. They must be taking their lessons about the EyeToy seriously – no compelling games? No sale.

Whilst this is the “first wave” that any platform has to suffer through, this first wave of games is coming right in the middle of an already mature game console cycle. We are getting bigger and better games all the time, and that was especially evident at the Sony press conference where they just kept whacking you with new, big, better games. It’s all up to Microsoft and Sony to show us the direction they want to head in with their motion controllers.

Meanwhile, Nintendo is laughing to the bank with all the core games they just announced for the Wii.

Woohoo!

OK, not really. All I did was use the <!DOCTYPE html> doctype. This site doesn’t use any HTML5 features, but it does use some CSS3.

The reason? One web browser treats unknown tags differently to the rest. That browser, Internet Explorer.

Until I found Dive into HTML5. It’s a free “book,” detailing HTML5 changes and even explains how you can HTML5-ify your site. And, it even describes a quirk in IE’s JavaScript that can be used to enable HTML5 components (of course, it means that your site is dependent on JS being turned on).

HTML5 was designed so that older browsers can still parse the document, unfortunately, it depended on functionality that 60% (or so) of the web browsing population don’t have.

You may be wondering why I used the HTML5 doctype then. Well, the answer is simple – it’s easy to remember. One annoyance I had with HTML4 was that if I wanted standards, I had to find a website that listed all the correct doctypes, figure out what I wanted, and pasted that in (yeah, I can’t remember them). HTML5 only has one, and it’s forwards compatible. (Who knows what they’ll do with HTML6, although I guess we won’t find out for another 20 years.)

We have a long way to go yet.

Late last year Facebook undertook a massive Privacy Settings overhaul. It was deprecating the “Networks” in favour of pages, i.e. you didn’t belong to the New Zealand Network, but the New Zealand page. In doing so, Facebook popped up on log in a dialog saying “We changed how our privacy settings works, please review your settings below.” I looked at them, and while the dialog was flakey (I complained that it wasn’t clear what “My current settings” was), I looked through them and determined my current settings were what I wanted.

Social Graphs and Personalisation

Facebook announced the Social Graph system and instant personalisation about a month ago. The former seems a lot like Twitter, and the latter seems to be something that should ask for your permission. Facebook stipulated that the only data sent is stuff that is open the everyone, yet then the cries of privacy being breached came. What happened?

My settings are pretty strict, I only share things between Friends or Friends of Friends. Well, there is the basic directory info that I share with everyone, and that’s because I want people to find me (a social network is for finding people and making connections, and if I can’t find you, then you don’t know what social networking is). Only people who I say “I know this person” can see what I’m doing and what I’m up to (although, most of the time, it’s to the oh-so-public Twitter, so, you know what I’m doing anyway).

And here’s the kicker, everyone was saying that Instant Personalisation was opt-out. Problem was, I never opted out, or opted in, and I’m not in it. I read the complaints on Twitter, when I inquired I got a “You’re kidding right?” When I figured out what the hell was going on, I found the Instant Personalisation screen and that the box wasn’t checked, and never has been.

Everyone, it means Everyone

Facebook uses the term “Everyone.” I can see why, Everyone is all emcompassing, and pretty much summarises in a single word who you are sharing your data with. But alas, there is that vague-ness about it. “So, Everyone means just people I’m friends with, right?”

When Facebook said “OK, now we have these API’s that lets people access that data,” people just went “Wait a minute. So, my data is public now?”

Yes, your data is public now, and has been since you said “Everyone” could access it.

They should probably call it something else, maybe, “Everyone, including people and businesses you don’t know.”

But, it did yield good results

The best thing about the privacy furor, good things did happen.

Facebook finally simplified the privacy controls – still giving that granular control that everyone wants, but made it simple at the same time. They should have had that to start with.

They also finally clarified what Everyone means…

Information you’ve shared with everyone – as well as your name, profile picture, gender and networks – could be seen by anyone on the Internet. Please be aware that it will be visible to anyone viewing your profile and applications and websites you and your friends use will be able to access it.

(Emphasis, theirs.)

In fact, I love their Privacy guide. Go and read it. It tells you exactly what’s going on, without the legalese. I wish every web site did this, for all legal policies. Take a look at the Creative Commons license I’ve got on this blog. It gives you an easy to read version of a legal document that can be understood by anyone looking at it for five seconds. If you must, you can dig deeper and look at the legal license that sits behind it.

Facebook also had a bug appear during the middle of all this which let you pretty much log in as someone else just by using a simple tool that lets you look at your profile as someone else. I expect QA would be tighter now on privacy than ever before.

The problem wasn’t just Facebook here, it was everyone, including people and businesses we don’t know. Facebook have done some pretty dodgy stuff (the do-first-ask-later game is getting pretty tiring), but when I read their privacy policy all I saw was “if you said that this information is public, then fair game.” Facebook asked, people said yes, but then changed their minds when it got real.

Of course, the simpler thing is to not put stuff up there you don’t want strangers to know.

more